Prosopis africana

Prosopis africana

Prosopis africana

Common Names: African mesquite, Iron tree, Sassy wood
Local Names: Kiriya (Hausa, Nigeria), Ayan (Yoruba, Nigeria), Ubwa (Igbo, Nigeria), Okpehe (Edo, Nigeria), Sanchi (Fulani, Nigeria)
Species ID: NMP-142 |
wfo-0000168965

Scientific Classification

Kingdom: Plantae

Phylum: Tracheophyta

Class: Magnoliopsida

Order: Fabales

Family: Fabaceae

Genus: Prosopis

Species: P. africana

Synonyms: Coulteria africana Guill. & Perr.; Prosopis oblonga Benth.; Anonychium lanceolatum Schweinf.; Anonychium africanum (Guill. & Perr.) C.E.Hughes & G.P.Lewis 

Morphological Description

Prosopis africana is a slow-growing, deciduous tree commonly reaching 4–20 m tall, with an open crown and drooping foliage (Orwa et al., 2009; Useful Tropical Plants, n.d.). It is widely recognized as an ecologically important dryland tree, often retained in parklands and fallows.

·       Trunk and Bark: Bark very dark and scaly; the slash is orange to red-brown with pale streaking (Orwa et al., 2009). The species is frequently described locally as “ironwood” due to its hard, durable timber (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Buttresses: Slightly rounded buttresses may occur on older stems (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Leaves: Alternate, bipinnate; rachis typically 10–15 cm, with 3–6 pairs of opposite pinnae (5–8 cm); each pinna bearing 9–16 pairs of oblong-lanceolate leaflets (approximately 12–30 mm), often pubescent; a gland is commonly present between pairs of pinnae and between leaflets (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Flowers: Greenish-white to yellow, fragrant, borne in dense axillary spikes commonly 6–10 cm long (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Fruit and Seeds: Pods dark brown, thick and hard, shiny; reported up to about 15 × 3 cm, with woody walls and compartmenting; seeds are loose and may rattle inside the pod (Orwa et al., 2009).

Distribution and Habitat

Prosopis africana is the only tropical African species in the genus Prosopis and occurs broadly from Senegal eastward toward Ethiopia, particularly in the transitional belt between Sahel and savanna forests (Orwa et al., 2009). Species-level taxonomy and occurrence are supported by global biodiversity databases (GBIF Secretariat, n.d.).

·       Ecological Zone: Sahelian to Sudanian savanna mosaics; commonly found in fallow lands and agroforestry parklands (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Altitude: Reported up to about 1,000 m (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Climate Tolerance: Documented across high-heat environments; the agroforestry profile reports a mean annual temperature range reaching up to 40°C and notes suitability in dry environments (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Soils: Frequently reported on sandy to clayey soils over laterite and described as tolerating many soil types (Orwa et al., 2009).

Conservation and Pressure: Due to extensive overexploitation, the agroforestry profile notes local disappearance from parts of the southern Sahel and adjacent Sudan savannas (Orwa et al., 2009). This is consistent with the species’ high demand for fuelwood and durable timber in dryland regions.

Ethnopharmacology

Traditional uses across West Africa include management of pain, inflammation, malaria-like febrile illnesses, and topical wound care.

·       Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory (traditional pain uses): In a rat/mouse model study, methanol stem bark extract (62.5–250 mg/kg) reduced acetic acid-induced writhing, with 76.89% inhibition at 250 mg/kg (compared with 83.16% for piroxicam). In carrageenan-induced paw edema, anti-inflammatory activity became significant from the third hour onward. Preliminary screening indicated presence of flavonoids, tannins, saponins, alkaloids, and cardiac glycosides (Ayanwuyi et al., 2010).

·       Wound Care and Hemostatic Use (traditional wound management): Methanol stem bark extract significantly reduced bleeding/clotting and coagulation time in rats, reduced epithelialization period in excision wounds, and inhibited multiple bacterial strains relevant to wound infection including Staphylococcus aureusPseudomonas aeruginosaKlebsiella pneumoniaeSalmonella typhi, and Bacillus subtilis. The study also reported phytochemical positivity for alkaloids, saponins, tannins, flavonoids, steroids, terpenoids, and carbohydrates (Ezike et al., 2010).

·       Antimalarial (traditional febrile and malaria treatment): A fractionation-guided in vivo study (mouse Plasmodium berghei model) reported that methanol, n-hexane, and ethyl acetate stem bark extracts suppressed parasitemia by 90.0%, 72.2%, and 73.6%, respectively. A chromatographic fraction (F5) showed 91.09% suppression at 12.5 mg/kg body weight, reported as exceeding chloroquine (87.79%) under the study conditions, and was associated with restoration of hematological indices and CD4+ counts. UPLC-QMS annotation of F5 reported compounds including caffeate, catechin, quercetin, apigenin-related annotation, terpinene-4-ol, linalool, quinovic acid, and prosopinine among identified constituents (Abubakar et al., 2024).

·       Dental Care and Anti-biofilm (traditional oral hygiene applications): Aqueous leaf and stem bark extracts were investigated against dental-caries-relevant targets. The aqueous stem bark extract showed strong antioxidant performance (ABTS IC50 = 4.58 ± 0.07 µg/mL), lipoxygenase inhibition (IC50 = 13.42 ± 1.26 µg/mL), anti-biofilm activity (63.6% at 100 µg/mL without reducing bacterial growth), and anti-quorum sensing inhibition (53.5%). The work evaluated antibiofilm effects on Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175 among other strains, aligning with dental caries management claims (Bance et al., 2021).

⚠ Toxicity Profile: Acute toxicity varies by extract, dose, and route. In a pain/inflammation study, oral median lethal dose estimates were reported as 3807.9 mg/kg in mice and greater than 5000 mg/kg in rats for the methanol stem bark extract under the study conditions (Ayanwuyi et al., 2010). In a wound-care study, an intraperitoneal LD50 of 774 mg/kg in mice was reported for a methanol stem bark extract, highlighting that route of exposure can substantially change toxicity outcomes (Ezike et al., 2010).

Additional Uses

·       Food and Fermentation: Seeds are used to produce fermented condiments known as okpeye/okpehe/okpiye. A classical fermentation study documented natural fermentation over 96 hours with microbial growth reaching approximately 106–108 cfu/g and frequent dominance of Bacillus spp., particularly B. subtilis and B. licheniformis (Achi, 1992). Modern microbiological evaluations continue to report food-safety and quality concerns linked to spontaneous fermentation processes (Agunwah et al., 2024).

·       Microbial Diversity in Okpeye: Culture-based work on Nigerian okpehe/okpeye documented diversity of Bacillus species associated with the product and emphasized its role as a low-cost protein source (Oguntoyinbo et al., 2010).

·       Agroforestry and Dryland Rehabilitation: Frequently retained in fallow and parkland systems; the agroforestry profile emphasizes its role in dryland landscapes and notes significant pressure from overexploitation (Orwa et al., 2009).

·       Timber and Fuel: The wood is widely sought for durable implements and fuel due to its hardness and perceived “ironwood” quality; the agroforestry profile highlights high utilization pressure across its range (Orwa et al., 2009).

References

  • Abubakar, F. A., Oloyede, H. O. B., & Salawu, M. O. (2024). Evaluation of antimalarial compounds in Prosopis africana stem bark fractions against Plasmodium bergheiNotulae Scientia Biologicae, 16(3).
  • Achi, O. K. (1992). Microorganisms associated with natural fermentation of Prosopis africana seeds for the production of okpiye. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 42(4), 297–304.
  • Agunwah, I. M., Okafor, U. C., & colleagues. (2024). Microbiological evaluation of the indigenous fermented condiment (okpeye) produced from Prosopis africana seeds. Scientific African.
  • Ayanwuyi, L. O., Yaro, A. H., & Abodunde, O. M. (2010). Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of the methanol stem bark extract of Prosopis africanaPharmaceutical Biology, 48(3), 296–299.
  • Bance, A., Sourabié, S., Compaoré, S., Compaore, E., Belem-Kabre, W. L. M. E., Ouedraogo, V., & Rouamba, A. (2021). Therapeutic properties of aqueous extracts of leaves and stem bark of Prosopis africana (Guill. & Perr.) Taub. (Fabaceae) used in the management of dental caries. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 11(6), 108–114.
  • Ezike, A. C., Akah, P. A., Okoli, C. O., Udegbunam, S., Okwume, N., Okeke, C., & Iloani, O. (2010). Medicinal plants used in wound care: A study of Prosopis africana (Fabaceae) stem bark. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 72(3), 334–339.
  • GBIF Secretariat. (n.d.). Prosopis africana (Guill. & Perr.) Taub. GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Retrieved December 23, 2025, from https://www.gbif.org/species/5358514
  • Oguntoyinbo, F. A., Huch, M., Cho, G.-S., Schillinger, U., Holzapfel, W. H., Sanni, A. I., & Franz, C. M. A. P. (2010). Diversity of Bacillus species isolated from okpehe, a traditional fermented soup condiment from Nigeria. Journal of Food Protection, 73(5), 870–878.
  • Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R., & Simons, A. (2009). Agroforestree database: A tree reference and selection guide (Version 4.0). World Agroforestry (ICRAF). Retrieved from https://apps.worldagroforestry.org/treedb/AFTPDFS/Prosopis_africana.PDF
  • Useful Tropical Plants. (n.d.). Prosopis africana. Retrieved December 23, 2025, from https://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Prosopis+africana
  • World Flora Online. (n.d.). Prosopis africana (Guill. & Perr.) Taub. (Taxon ID: wfo-0000168965). Retrieved from https://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-0000168965

External Links

More Pictures

 

Compounds of Prosopis africana
References

Doughari, J. H., & Saa-Aondo, M. (2021). Phytochemical analysis of crude methanol extracts and antimicrobial activity of n-hexane fractions of methanol seed and pod extracts of Prosopis Africana on some selected microrganisms. Archives, 2, 121-137.

Alagbe, J. O. (2023). Bioactive compounds of Prosopis Africana oil (African mesquite) using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS) technique. Food Science & Applied Microbiology Reports, 2(1), 34-40.